Talk:World of Minecraft
Contents |
[edit] History of WoM
Quatro, would you mind not changing back the first paragraph of the WoM page, as this is how WoM really came to be, told by H4X himself.
[edit] Bias?
"The idea of the custom client[1] was brought up to make building easier and faster. It was never made to take away from the feel of Minecraft, yet people still believe that it does. The client wrapper allows you to perform special actions that aren't normally available in the web based client and doesn't require a browser to be loaded while you play."
I don't feel that this belongs on the page, it reads like an accusation rather than a statement.
- I agree. Section removed.--Quatroking - Garble Garble! 19:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Elitist.
The WoM are just a bunch of elitist c***suckers who believe themselves to be "gods" of minecraft.
They claim that Custom Servers were made possible because of the foundation they laid with their custom server. Bull-f***ing-s***. Any idiot can make a custom server. Hell, I've already made a custom server complete with every command that WoM's has. I even have commands they have that arent public knowledge, because I managed to snag a copy of their custom server software, thanks to a mole on the inside, so to speak.
And their client wrapper? Hacked it. Removed the coding that causes the client to check the WoM Griefer List. That will be made public by myself very soon. And yes, I realize griefers will finally have hacks for themselves without having to worry about the WoM. I don't give a f***.
The Whole F-in Show has spoken.
Edit: GIVO
well if you got the wom server software why dont you make it public. smart a**
http://www.worldofminecraft.com/node/4525#comment-8290
- I don't believe talk pages allow this sort of behaviour. SteveZombie 17:16, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
[edit] "Unique" commands
I know this is me just being finnicky, but everything under the "Unique commands" heading is not "unique". I changed it once, but someone reverted it. :| Zallist 16:57, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed. They are not at all unique. fixing now. -Izacque 19:46, 10 November 2010 (CST)
